The number of social networks is rapidly growing and for the sustainably minded networker, there is enviMotion. Some members compare enviMotion to a mix between Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin and Groupon. This social network is designed to bring together all those interested in sustainable development. The network welcomes businesses and NGOs involved in sustainability, industry experts, and others committed to sustainable development.
enviMotion allows everyone to be a part of information sharing and discussions on sustainable development related topics, news and special offers.
Members can share their sustainable development commitment and get the latest news on environmental policies and processes. The platform is well suited to creating partnerships. Specialists (companies whose activity is directly linked with sustainable development), can communicate on their activity, projects, and sustainable development policy. Specialists can also add jobs and internship listings.
More than 460 companies, associations and communities from 20 countries have already joined this social network.
To find out more or to join click here.
© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.
Related Posts
Top Green Social Networks
The Growth of Social Media as an Increasingly Important Vehicle for the Environment
Environmental Activism and Social Media
The Revolutionary Power of Social Media Driving Corporate Environmental Sustainability
Social Media Marketing and Environmental Sustainability
Best Green and Sustainable Business Twitter Feeds
Top 20 Green and Sustainable Business Facebook Groups
EvanCarmichael's List of Top 50 Social Entrepreneurship Blogs
Social Media and the Green Message: WWF Global Online Event
Sunday, August 7, 2011
Saturday, August 6, 2011
Population is Compounding Climate Change
A recent episode of Hardball with Chris Matthews asks the question, what is the relationship between ongoing heat waves and global population? As revealed in daily news reports we are continually breaking climatic records as we change weather patterns on earth. Even though the people who are having the greatest number of children are emitting the smallest per capita amount of greenhouse gases, it is obvious that the more people there are, the more GHGs are emitted. Population is a sensitive issue but the provision of family planning services is intimately connected to managing climate change. The more people there are on the earth the more the climate will change. With the world population expected to be 7 billion on October 31, 2011, there is an urgent need to address the issue of overpopulation.
© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.
Related Posts
Population Growth and Climate Change will Add to the World Water Crisis
Environmental Impact of Overpopulation and Sustainable Development
Environmental Impact of Overpopulation and Sustainable Development
Growth in World Population Threatens Environment
World Population Day 2010: Everyone Counts
The Psychology of Climate Change and the Business of Change
Thursday, August 4, 2011
Let Boehner Know that US Competitiveness Should not be Compromised
Under the cuts imposed by the Republicans, US competitiveness is being compromised. The American people expect Congress to come together to ensure that America can be competitive with the rest of the world. To be competitive forward looking nations are investing in the green economy because they understand that competitiveness is increasingly about sustainable economic growth and green jobs.
Republicans said no to the President Obama's balanced approach that pairs an increase in the debt ceiling with responsible steps to reduce America's long-term deficit. However, despite support from most Americans, Republicans will not accept any form of compromise that might force the very rich and oil companies to pay their fair share.
There is another way to increase revenues and this involves growing the green economy, but again Republicans refuse investments that will contribute to economic growth.
Republicans are opposing efforts to increase revenues, not only by refusing tax increases for the wealthiest 2 percent, but by cutting agencies and programs responsible for environmental programs. These are the types of programs that could help make America competitive in the new green economy.
Each of us must get involved to resist the Republican's petty partisanship and tell House Speaker John Boehner, that US competitiveness in the green economy must not be compromised.
Call Boehner now at 202-225-0600.
© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.
Related Posts
The Credit Downgrade and the Green Economy
Environmental Implications of the Credit Ceiling Agreement
The US Debt Ceiling Crisis and the Green Economy
Republican Obstructionism on the Debt Ceiling Risks Global Environmental Collapse
EDF Campaign Opposing US Anti-Environment Bill
Republican Assault on the Environment
Gerry Connolly Video: Climate Disasters And GOP Denial
Blumenauer Video: 'The Jihad Against Climate Change Continues'
Chu Video: The Worst Anti-Environmental Bill of her Career
Republicans said no to the President Obama's balanced approach that pairs an increase in the debt ceiling with responsible steps to reduce America's long-term deficit. However, despite support from most Americans, Republicans will not accept any form of compromise that might force the very rich and oil companies to pay their fair share.
There is another way to increase revenues and this involves growing the green economy, but again Republicans refuse investments that will contribute to economic growth.
Republicans are opposing efforts to increase revenues, not only by refusing tax increases for the wealthiest 2 percent, but by cutting agencies and programs responsible for environmental programs. These are the types of programs that could help make America competitive in the new green economy.
Each of us must get involved to resist the Republican's petty partisanship and tell House Speaker John Boehner, that US competitiveness in the green economy must not be compromised.
Call Boehner now at 202-225-0600.
© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.
Related Posts
The Credit Downgrade and the Green Economy
Environmental Implications of the Credit Ceiling Agreement
The US Debt Ceiling Crisis and the Green Economy
Republican Obstructionism on the Debt Ceiling Risks Global Environmental Collapse
EDF Campaign Opposing US Anti-Environment Bill
Republican Assault on the Environment
Gerry Connolly Video: Climate Disasters And GOP Denial
Blumenauer Video: 'The Jihad Against Climate Change Continues'
Chu Video: The Worst Anti-Environmental Bill of her Career
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
EPA Proposes Standards for the Airline Industry
The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed nitrogen oxide (NOx) standards for engines used in large commercial aircraft. In addition to being a global warming causing greenhouse gas (GHG), NOx emissions are known to cause and aggravate lung diseases and increase susceptibility to respiratory infection.
The proposed standards came shortly after the courts upheld the EPA's responsibility to regulate carbon emissions from aviation. As reported in Courthouse News, early in July, a US District Court judge denied a motion to dismiss claims that the EPA had failed to investigate aircraft engine emissions. He said that the agency had ignored “a required component of the regulatory process.”
The legal challenge was issued by Friends of the Earth and the Center for Biological Diversity who want to compel the EPA to formally determine whether greenhouse gas pollution from aircraft endangers human health and welfare. The judgement also opens the door to US federal regulation of GHGs from aviation.
“We are happy with today’s order. The court has made clear that the EPA has a mandatory obligation to conduct an endangerment finding for aviation emissions,” said Sarah Burt, an Earthjustice attorney. “We will continue to work to compel the EPA to act as soon as possible on marine and nonroad sources of pollution as well as aircraft emissions.”
In response to the District Court decision, the EPA has proposed adopting the NOx emission standards approved by the United Nations’ International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). According to the EPA the proposal would reduce ground-level NOx emissions by about 100,000 tons nationwide by 2030.
There would be two tiers, referred to as Tier 6 (or CAEP/6) standards and Tier 8 (or CAEP/8) standards. Tier 6 would apply to all new engines starting in 2013, and Tier 8 would apply starting in 2014.
The EPA is also proposing requiring all gas turbine and turboprop engine manufacturers report emissions data to the agency, for the purpose of conducting emission analyses and developing aviation policy.
The EPA's proposed aviation standards are particularly timely in light of American commericial aviation's legal challenge to the EU's plans requiring all airlines to participate in a continent wide emissions trading system. EPA standards in the US make an important statement as American companies challenge Europe's right to protect the environment.
© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.
Related Posts
Environmental Implications of the Credit Ceiling Agreement
Republican Assault on the Environment
Supreme Court Recognizes EPA Role in Carbon Pollution Protection
EPA's New Clean Air Rules
The EPA Proposes Cleaner Air
EPA's Proposed Rule to Regulate Emissions
Winners of the 2011 Green Chemistry Awards
Environmental Compliance and Enforcement at ...
Course of Study: Climate Change and the Law
Policies Contributing to More Robust
EPA's New Mileage Estimates for the Volt and the ...
EPA's Top 20 On-Site Power Generation List
Zotos Earns a Place on the EPA's Top 20 On-Site ...
Video: EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson
America's New Fuel Efficiency Standards
US Government's New Car Ratings
America's New Car Ratings: Consumer Concerns and ...
The Environmental and Economic Implications of a Government Shutdown
Republicans Dethrone Czars and Defund the President's
Republican's Fail in their Bid to Defund the EPA
Republican Cuts Target Green Jobs
The Foxes in the Henhouse: Republicans in Charge ...
Koch Industries War with the EPA
The proposed standards came shortly after the courts upheld the EPA's responsibility to regulate carbon emissions from aviation. As reported in Courthouse News, early in July, a US District Court judge denied a motion to dismiss claims that the EPA had failed to investigate aircraft engine emissions. He said that the agency had ignored “a required component of the regulatory process.”
The legal challenge was issued by Friends of the Earth and the Center for Biological Diversity who want to compel the EPA to formally determine whether greenhouse gas pollution from aircraft endangers human health and welfare. The judgement also opens the door to US federal regulation of GHGs from aviation.
“We are happy with today’s order. The court has made clear that the EPA has a mandatory obligation to conduct an endangerment finding for aviation emissions,” said Sarah Burt, an Earthjustice attorney. “We will continue to work to compel the EPA to act as soon as possible on marine and nonroad sources of pollution as well as aircraft emissions.”
In response to the District Court decision, the EPA has proposed adopting the NOx emission standards approved by the United Nations’ International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). According to the EPA the proposal would reduce ground-level NOx emissions by about 100,000 tons nationwide by 2030.
There would be two tiers, referred to as Tier 6 (or CAEP/6) standards and Tier 8 (or CAEP/8) standards. Tier 6 would apply to all new engines starting in 2013, and Tier 8 would apply starting in 2014.
The EPA is also proposing requiring all gas turbine and turboprop engine manufacturers report emissions data to the agency, for the purpose of conducting emission analyses and developing aviation policy.
The EPA's proposed aviation standards are particularly timely in light of American commericial aviation's legal challenge to the EU's plans requiring all airlines to participate in a continent wide emissions trading system. EPA standards in the US make an important statement as American companies challenge Europe's right to protect the environment.
© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.
Related Posts
Environmental Implications of the Credit Ceiling Agreement
Republican Assault on the Environment
Supreme Court Recognizes EPA Role in Carbon Pollution Protection
EPA's New Clean Air Rules
The EPA Proposes Cleaner Air
EPA's Proposed Rule to Regulate Emissions
Winners of the 2011 Green Chemistry Awards
Environmental Compliance and Enforcement at ...
Course of Study: Climate Change and the Law
Policies Contributing to More Robust
EPA's New Mileage Estimates for the Volt and the ...
EPA's Top 20 On-Site Power Generation List
Zotos Earns a Place on the EPA's Top 20 On-Site ...
Video: EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson
America's New Fuel Efficiency Standards
US Government's New Car Ratings
America's New Car Ratings: Consumer Concerns and ...
The Environmental and Economic Implications of a Government Shutdown
Republicans Dethrone Czars and Defund the President's
Republican's Fail in their Bid to Defund the EPA
Republican Cuts Target Green Jobs
The Foxes in the Henhouse: Republicans in Charge ...
Koch Industries War with the EPA
Tuesday, August 2, 2011
Environmental Implications of the Credit Ceiling Agreement
Republicans used the looming debt crisis to force their anti-environment agenda on America. The credit ceiling agreement passed by the House on August 1, makes the Tea Party the big winner and intransigence the winning tactic. Although widely referred to as a "compromise," the Democrats made most of the concessions including eradicating tax increases for the top 2 percent of Americans and big cuts to the EPA. There is also significantly reduced funding for important energy and water projects.
As reported in Platts, former Clinton administration energy advisor Elgie Holstein said the agreement will result in cuts to a range of energy and environmental programs. These cuts are expected to be around the same levels as those House Republicans proposed for the fiscal 2012 budget.
"I think the house FY12 numbers give us a preview of that, and these new numbers are probably going to be even tougher," said Holstein, now a senior director at the Environmental Defense Fund. "While the big headline grabbing fight over the debt ceiling deadline may be settling down, the real program-by-program fights are just beginning."
The agreement, raises the debt ceiling in two tiers each with an accompanying set of spending cuts. The bill immediately puts in place federal spending limits for the next 10 years, beginning with the fiscal 2012 budget.
For Democrats there is not a lot of good news. For those concerned about the environment it is even worse.
For fiscal 2012, the deal would allow a total of $1.043 trillion in federal discretionary spending. These spending caps make it very unlikely that the Senate will be able increase spending levels for energy and environmental programs.
The energy and water development appropriations bill (H.R. 2354) approved by the House on July 15, would provide the Department of Energy with $850 million less than it received in 2011 reducing the DOE budget to $24.7 billion in fiscal 2012.
Under the Interior appropriations bill (H.R. 2584), the Environmental Protection Agency, Interior Department and related agencies would receive $3.8 billion less than the amount requested by the White House reducing the budget to $27.5 billion. EPA would get $1.5 billion less than this year for a total budget of $7.1 billion in 2012.
The cuts are far from over with a congressional committee scheduled to find another $1.5 trillion in cuts later this year.
White House spokesman Jay Carney tried to find a silver lining to this dismal agreement for the environment by saying that oil subsidies could be on the table for congressional committee cuts later this year.
"If the joint committee decides, for example, that part of a balanced deal should be to eliminate tax subsidies for oil and gas companies -- as the president has called for, they can do that and they would raise revenues through doing that," Carney said at a White House briefing.
After being rewarded for their obstructionism, there is no reason to believe that Republicans will stop using the tactics that got them this far. Even though tax increases for the wealthiest 2 percent are supported by the majority of Americans, they are unlikely to get any Republican support.
Even with all the concessions made by Democrats, many Republicans are still complaining they did not get enough.
A vote will be held in the Senate later today where the agreement on the debt ceiling is expected to pass.
GOP partisanship is undermining America's democracy. Although it does not reflect the democratic will of the American people, Republicans and their Tea Party supporters held America hostage, and won.
© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.
Related Posts
The Credit Downgrade and the Green Economy
The US Debt Ceiling Crisis and the Green Economy
Let Boehner Know that US Competitiveness Should not be Compromised
Republican Obstructionism on the Debt Ceiling Risks Global Environmental Collapse
EDF Campaign Opposing US Anti-Environment Bill
Republican Assault on the Environment
Gerry Connolly Video: Climate Disasters And GOP Denial
Blumenauer Video: 'The Jihad Against Climate Change Continues'
Chu Video: The Worst Anti-Environmental Bill of her Career
As reported in Platts, former Clinton administration energy advisor Elgie Holstein said the agreement will result in cuts to a range of energy and environmental programs. These cuts are expected to be around the same levels as those House Republicans proposed for the fiscal 2012 budget.
"I think the house FY12 numbers give us a preview of that, and these new numbers are probably going to be even tougher," said Holstein, now a senior director at the Environmental Defense Fund. "While the big headline grabbing fight over the debt ceiling deadline may be settling down, the real program-by-program fights are just beginning."
The agreement, raises the debt ceiling in two tiers each with an accompanying set of spending cuts. The bill immediately puts in place federal spending limits for the next 10 years, beginning with the fiscal 2012 budget.
For Democrats there is not a lot of good news. For those concerned about the environment it is even worse.
For fiscal 2012, the deal would allow a total of $1.043 trillion in federal discretionary spending. These spending caps make it very unlikely that the Senate will be able increase spending levels for energy and environmental programs.
The energy and water development appropriations bill (H.R. 2354) approved by the House on July 15, would provide the Department of Energy with $850 million less than it received in 2011 reducing the DOE budget to $24.7 billion in fiscal 2012.
Under the Interior appropriations bill (H.R. 2584), the Environmental Protection Agency, Interior Department and related agencies would receive $3.8 billion less than the amount requested by the White House reducing the budget to $27.5 billion. EPA would get $1.5 billion less than this year for a total budget of $7.1 billion in 2012.
The cuts are far from over with a congressional committee scheduled to find another $1.5 trillion in cuts later this year.
White House spokesman Jay Carney tried to find a silver lining to this dismal agreement for the environment by saying that oil subsidies could be on the table for congressional committee cuts later this year.
"If the joint committee decides, for example, that part of a balanced deal should be to eliminate tax subsidies for oil and gas companies -- as the president has called for, they can do that and they would raise revenues through doing that," Carney said at a White House briefing.
After being rewarded for their obstructionism, there is no reason to believe that Republicans will stop using the tactics that got them this far. Even though tax increases for the wealthiest 2 percent are supported by the majority of Americans, they are unlikely to get any Republican support.
Even with all the concessions made by Democrats, many Republicans are still complaining they did not get enough.
A vote will be held in the Senate later today where the agreement on the debt ceiling is expected to pass.
GOP partisanship is undermining America's democracy. Although it does not reflect the democratic will of the American people, Republicans and their Tea Party supporters held America hostage, and won.
© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.
Related Posts
The Credit Downgrade and the Green Economy
The US Debt Ceiling Crisis and the Green Economy
Let Boehner Know that US Competitiveness Should not be Compromised
Republican Obstructionism on the Debt Ceiling Risks Global Environmental Collapse
EDF Campaign Opposing US Anti-Environment Bill
Republican Assault on the Environment
Gerry Connolly Video: Climate Disasters And GOP Denial
Blumenauer Video: 'The Jihad Against Climate Change Continues'
Chu Video: The Worst Anti-Environmental Bill of her Career
Monday, August 1, 2011
Supreme Court Recognizes EPA Role in Carbon Pollution Protection
Carbon reduction is critically important particularly in power production. As America's biggest polluters, power plants are pumping more than two billion tons of carbon dioxide pollution into the air each year.
On the day the Supreme Court ruling was announced, David Doniger, policy director of the Climate Center at the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), applauded the decsion saying:
"Today's ruling reaffirms the Environmental Protection Agency's duty under the nation’s 40-year-old Clean Air Act to safeguard public health and welfare from dangerous carbon pollution. Now the EPA must act without delay."According to Doniger, the pollution from power plants, "is driving dangerous heat waves and smog, stronger storms, floods, and droughts, and many other threats to our health and safety and our homes and communities."
The reduction of pollution from energy generation is a critical component of managing the climate crisis. With the Supreme Court ruling the EPA now has additional legal authority to limit carbon emissions.
© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.
Related Posts
Environmental Implications of the Credit Ceiling Agreement
Republican Assault on the Environment
EPA's New Clean Air Rules
The EPA Proposes Cleaner Air
EPA's Proposed Rule to Regulate Emissions
Winners of the 2011 Green Chemistry Awards
Environmental Compliance and Enforcement at ...
Course of Study: Climate Change and the Law
Policies Contributing to More Robust
EPA's New Mileage Estimates for the Volt and the ...
EPA's Top 20 On-Site Power Generation List
Zotos Earns a Place on the EPA's Top 20 On-Site ...
Video: EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson
America's New Fuel Efficiency Standards
US Government's New Car Ratings
America's New Car Ratings: Consumer Concerns and ...
A New Energy Economy: Obama's Gift to America ...
The Environmental and Economic Implications of a Government Shutdown
Republicans Dethrone Czars and Defund the President's
Republican's Fail in their Bid to Defund the EPA
Republican Cuts Target Green Jobs
The Foxes in the Henhouse: Republicans in Charge ...
Koch Industries War with the EPA
The US Debt Ceiling Crisis and the Green Economy
On Sunday July 31st, President Obama announced that a compromise has been reached to avert an American credit default. The President's announcement came just as the Asian markets opened for business causing Tokyo's Nikkei Index and the valuation of the American dollar to respond favorably.
If it passes in the House and the Senate, this deal will succeed in averting a Tuesday, August 2nd deadline.
A credit default would be devastating to the environment and the economy. As a sector with unparalleled growth potential, the green economy could address the revenue shortfalls that cause debt crises without raising taxes. As many economists are warning, investment in the green market is vital to economic growth and competitiveness.
Additional economic hardships arising from a credit default would all but eliminate any hope for government investment in the green economy. Government investments in things like renewable energy and efficiency are crucial to protecting the planet and helping the economy to grow. The US cannot afford to wait for jobs that will never return, it is time to address climate change and create jobs by investing in the next economy.
Although this is hardly a good deal, it is better than having no deal at all. The credit rating agencies made it clear that the AAA rating the US has enjoyed since 1917 was at risk. Many pundits predicted that in addition to eroding confidence, increasing inflationary pressures, raising interest rates and perhaps even auguring a double dip recession, a credit default would have a ripple effect felt around the world.
The President wanted an agreement, but this was not the deal he wanted. Despite the unhappy people on both sides of the political divide, the agreement will have to be passed quickly in both chambers of Congress to beat the August 2nd deadline.
Further cuts are expected as part of this agreement. However, this is at odds with the fact that further investments are also required if America is to be competitive in the new green economy.
Servicing a $14 trillion debt is enormously expensive. Cuts are necessary, but if the US hopes to be competitive in the economy of tomorrow, the US government must follow the leads of other states like the UK and China and invest in the future. This means investing in the kind of growth that produces good jobs.
America once rallied around the iconic words of President J.F. Kennedy, “We will go to the moon and do other things, not because they are easy but because they are hard.” Now we must say, we invest in the green economy, not because it is easy, but because it is necessary.
America's economic well being and the health of the environment are intimately interdependent, you cannot have one without the other. Budget cuts are necessary, but so are investments that position the US as a leader in the emerging green economy.
© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.
Related Posts
Environmental Implications of the Credit Ceiling Agreement
Chu Video: The Worst Anti-Environmental Bill of her Career
Gerry Connolly Video: Climate Disasters And GOP Denial
Blumenauer Video: 'The Jihad Against Climate Change Continues'
Republican Obstructionism on the Debt Ceiling Risks Global Environmental Collapse
EDF Campaign Opposing US Anti-Environment Bill
Republican Assault on the Environment
If it passes in the House and the Senate, this deal will succeed in averting a Tuesday, August 2nd deadline.
A credit default would be devastating to the environment and the economy. As a sector with unparalleled growth potential, the green economy could address the revenue shortfalls that cause debt crises without raising taxes. As many economists are warning, investment in the green market is vital to economic growth and competitiveness.
Additional economic hardships arising from a credit default would all but eliminate any hope for government investment in the green economy. Government investments in things like renewable energy and efficiency are crucial to protecting the planet and helping the economy to grow. The US cannot afford to wait for jobs that will never return, it is time to address climate change and create jobs by investing in the next economy.
Although this is hardly a good deal, it is better than having no deal at all. The credit rating agencies made it clear that the AAA rating the US has enjoyed since 1917 was at risk. Many pundits predicted that in addition to eroding confidence, increasing inflationary pressures, raising interest rates and perhaps even auguring a double dip recession, a credit default would have a ripple effect felt around the world.
The President wanted an agreement, but this was not the deal he wanted. Despite the unhappy people on both sides of the political divide, the agreement will have to be passed quickly in both chambers of Congress to beat the August 2nd deadline.
Further cuts are expected as part of this agreement. However, this is at odds with the fact that further investments are also required if America is to be competitive in the new green economy.
Servicing a $14 trillion debt is enormously expensive. Cuts are necessary, but if the US hopes to be competitive in the economy of tomorrow, the US government must follow the leads of other states like the UK and China and invest in the future. This means investing in the kind of growth that produces good jobs.
America once rallied around the iconic words of President J.F. Kennedy, “We will go to the moon and do other things, not because they are easy but because they are hard.” Now we must say, we invest in the green economy, not because it is easy, but because it is necessary.
America's economic well being and the health of the environment are intimately interdependent, you cannot have one without the other. Budget cuts are necessary, but so are investments that position the US as a leader in the emerging green economy.
© 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.
Related Posts
Environmental Implications of the Credit Ceiling Agreement
Chu Video: The Worst Anti-Environmental Bill of her Career
Gerry Connolly Video: Climate Disasters And GOP Denial
Blumenauer Video: 'The Jihad Against Climate Change Continues'
Republican Obstructionism on the Debt Ceiling Risks Global Environmental Collapse
EDF Campaign Opposing US Anti-Environment Bill
Republican Assault on the Environment
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


