Sunday, May 8, 2011

Video: The Reality of Climate Change

In this video the Socio Capitalist interviews Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Andrew Dessler, and climate scientist at Texas A&M University. Dessler addresses the well-established science behind climate change. Other areas discussed include:

  • The reality of climate change from the perspective of the scientific community
  • The distorted view that policymakers and the general public have on climate change
  • Media’s role in conveying information inaccurately
  • The science behind climate change
  • Water Vapor’s role in climate change


  • Click here to see the video interview with Climate Scientist Dr. Andrew Dessler from The Socio Capitalist on Vimeo.

    © 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

    Related Posts
    Video: Debate on Climate Science and Policy Implications
    Debunking CO2 Myths and The Science of Climate Change
    Green Dissent (Part 1)
    Green Dissent (Part 2)
    Green Science
    The Effects of Global Warming
    Primer on CO2 and other GHGs
    How to get Through to Climate Change Deniers

    Saturday, May 7, 2011

    Video: Debate on Climate Science and Policy Implications



    It is hard to find an intelligent debate on climate change because the evidence is so overwhelming that the only people prepared to argue against the veracity of global warming tend to be dumber than dirt or Republicans (or both). In this video, professor Andrew Dessler from Texas A&M presents the scientific evidence of anthropogenic global warming while professor Richard Lindzen from MIT makes a valiant attempt to refute the obvious. In the second half of the video, University of Virginia Law School professors Jonathan Cannon and Jason Johnston debate the policy implications.

    © 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

    Thursday, May 5, 2011

    The Last Best Hope to Combat Climate Change

    With governments unable or unwilling to pass climate change legislation we need to consider how others have successfully faced serious adversity. In the US there is no hope for climate change legislation for the remainder of President Obama's first term and the recent victory of the Canadian Conservatives has shelved government support for a low carbon economy in that country for the next four years.

    Due to the fact that we are unlikely to see significant policy and legislative actions, we need to consider other ways of advancing meaningful change.

    Perhaps we need to revive the eternal wisdom of well respected leaders like Abraham Lincoln. This is a man who successfully navigated virulent opposition. Lincoln said, "I am a firm believer in the people. If given the truth, they can be depended upon to meet any national crises. The great point is to bring them the real facts."

    In our times the provision of the 'real facts' is impeded by the propaganda machines of powerful oil interests and the politicians who are beholden to them. Nonetheless, we must try to move forward, As Lincoln said, “You cannot escape the responsibility of tomorrow by evading it today.” Despite the obstacles we face we must press on,"The probability that we may fail in the struggle ought not to deter us from the support of a cause we believe to be just." Lincoln encourages us from the grave to work tirelessly towards what is right. “To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men.”

    Lincoln was one of the greatest leaders in human history and in his day he faced a series of challenges, most notably bloody resistance to the emancipation proclamation. Lincoln's "last best hope" letter to Congress contains some statements that are relevant to the dire environmental crisis we face today.

    On December 1, 1862, one month before signing the Emancipation Proclamation, President Lincoln sent a message to Congress in which he said:

    "We can succeed only by concert. It is not "can any of us imagine better?" but, "can we all do better?" The dogmas of the quiet past, are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise -- with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew. We must disenthrall ourselves, and then we shall save our country."

    "Fellow-citizens, we cannot escape history. We of this Congress and this administration, will be remembered in spite of ourselves. No personal significance, or insignificance, can spare one or another of us. The fiery trial through which we pass, will light us down, in honor or dishonor, to the latest generation. We say we are for the Union. The world will not forget that we say this. We know how to save the Union. The world knows we do know how to save it. We -- even we here -- hold the power, and bear the responsibility. In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom to the free -- honorable alike in what we give, and what we preserve. We shall nobly save, or meanly lose, the last best hope of earth."

    Although these words were written almost 150 years ago, they resonate in light of the current environmental impasse. Today our very survival depends on freeing the environment from the slavery of human abuse.

    As Lincoln said, “America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.”

    © 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

    Next: Business Will Lead the War Against Climate Change

    Wednesday, May 4, 2011

    No Reprieve for the Environment as Slacktivists Hand Majority to Canadian Conservatives

    The 2011 Canadian federal election vindicates those who characterize young people as apathetic. Had Canada's youth voted in larger numbers they could have prevented a Conservative majority, instead they generated a lot of online buzz, but failed to pull the trigger when it counted. In many parts of the country it appears that the under 30s did not leave their computers and cell phones long enough to cast a vote.

    Although we will not have hard data from Elections Canada for a few weeks, publications like Saanich News are reporting low youth vote turnout: "Despite expectations, early numbers suggest social media hype before Monday’s election did not translate into more young people making it to the polls."

    The election of US President Barack Obama succeeded due in large part to the youth vote. Many were hoping that similar youth involvement in Canada would impede the Conservative's assault on the environment. With fewer than 14 million ballots cast in the last federal election, Canada's 5.5 million Canadians under the age of 30 could have been a game changer.

    The reason why younger voters are so important is because they tend to favor parties other than the Conservatives. In the 2008 federal election less than 40 percent of young people voted and although advanced polling suggested that we would see a surge of young voters, Canada's youth did not materialize in sufficient numbers to deny a Conservative majority.

    The fact that the Conservatives won 167 seats indicates that young people did not get out and vote en masse. Although Canada's youth did help propel the NDP to a second place finish with 31 percent of the popular vote. An “orange crush” of historic NDP support swept through Quebec, parts of Ontario and the Prairies to give the party 102 seats. “You, young Canadians, are an inspiration and a source of hope for our country’s future,” NDP leader Jack Layton told a large crowd in downtown Toronto.

    Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff resigned after his party lost more than half their seats leaving them with 34.“We’ve seen tonight, I think, the emergence of a polarization in Canadian politics,” a defeated Ignatieff told supporters in Toronto. The people may be polarized, but the power is now in the hands of the Conservatives. Canadians failure to vote against the Conservatives have given a majority to a party that will aggressively support tar sands oil and largely ignore the environment and the green economy.

    In British Columbia, Green Party leader Elizabeth May won the party’s first-ever elected seat in Saanich—Gulf Islands. The Green Party's first seat along with Liberal losses and NDP gains make this a historic election. This election is also historic as a missed opportunity to reverse Canada's anti-environment trajectory.

    According to an early Elections Canada report, 61 percent of eligible Canadians voted in the 2011 federal election. The 2011 turnout was only slightly more than 2008's dismal electoral participation of 59 percent.

    More than 70,000 youth had pledged to vote as part of the “I Will Vote” campaign, but efforts to boost the youth vote with social media and vote mobs were insufficient to prevent a Conservative majority. The outcome of the 2011 election indicates that while Canadian youth like online campaigns, they are not interested in doing much to manage climate change, even when it concerns an action as simple as voting.

    Some attribute lower than expected youth voter turnout to a lack of engagement by Canada's political parties and the need for more face-to-face mobilization. The truth is the 2011 election results show that Canada's youth are indeed an apathetic group of slackers, (hence the expression slacktivists). Even though the under 30s claim to care about efforts to manage climate change, through their inaction they have effectively given the Conservatives carte blanche to continue to ravage the environment.

    Young Canadians could have moved beyond raising awareness and started changing the world. Instead the under 30s stayed home in many parts of the country. Canada's youth missed a historic opportunity to use their democratic rights to lead the country into the future and enjoin the battle against climate change.

    © 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

    Next: The Last Best Hope to Combat Climate Change

    Related Posts
    Youth Vote May Determine the Outcome of the Canadian Federal Election
    Vote for Canada Vote for the Environment Vote for Change
    Strategic Voting by Canada's Youth Threatens Conservatives
    Social Media Mobilizing Youth in the Canadian Federal Election
    Leadnow: Voting for Change in Canada
    Leadnow's Declaration For Change
    Video: Leadnow Interview on CPAC
    Video: Vote Mobs Getting Youth Involved in Canada's Democracy
    Video: Leadnow's My Canada
    Environmental Issues in the 2011 Canadian Federal Election
    Environmental Platforms of Canada's Federal Parties in 2008
    Canadian Conservatives Repudiation of the Environment in 2008
    Canada's Conservatives at Odds with the Public on Climate Change
    Conservatives Ignore Canadians While Jeopardizing the Environment and the Economy
    Canada's Conservative Government Opposes Kyoto and Hampers Progress at COP16
    World Urges Canada to Fight Climate Change
    The State of Canada's Environment
    Canada is a World Leader in GHG Emissions
    WWF's Canadian Living Planet Report
    Green Market Opportunity Being Missed by Canada
    Why Canadian Environment Minister Resigned
    Conservatives Ignore Canadians While Jeopardizing the Environment
    Copenhagen Accord: Canada to Reduce its GHG Emissions
    The Impact of a Climate Change Deal on Canada
    Conservative Budget: No Green for Canada
    Canada Votes: Environmental Politics
    Green Policy Debated in Canadian Parliament

    Monday, May 2, 2011

    Youth Vote May Determine the Outcome of the Canadian Federal Election

    The youth vote could oust Harper's anti-environment Conservatives. Although polls in the days before the election indicate that the Conservatives are losing ground to the NDP, that shift may be even more pronounced than the results suggest. National polls of party preferences, draw upon the views of people with land lines. However, the majority of 18 to 24 year-olds use cell phones so they are not counted in polling results.

    At the very least young people are likely to foil a Conservative majority. If the youth vote doubles from 2008, it is entirely possible that the NDP or Liberals may form a minority government. If the youth vote triples, we may even see an NDP or Liberal majority.

    Canadian youth are strong supporters of the environment and many hold staunch anti-Conservative views. Vote mob websites, and opinion pieces in university newpapers single out Conservatives for criticism, not the Liberals, NDP or Greens. The environment is an important issue for many of those who organized vote mobs. A number of these people have been actively involved with the progressive environmental action groups like 350.org.

    No one can be sure exactly what percentage of those participating in vote mobs will actually cast a vote, but by the end of election day we may find that the youth vote has been vastly underestimated by the pundits and the pollsters.

    © 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

    Related Posts
    Vote for Canada Vote for the Environment Vote for Change
    Strategic Voting by Canada's Youth Threatens Conservatives
    Social Media Mobilizing Youth in the Canadian Federal Election
    Leadnow: Voting for Change in Canada
    Leadnow's Declaration For Change
    Video: Leadnow Interview on CPAC
    Video: Vote Mobs Getting Youth Involved in Canada's Democracy
    Video: Leadnow's My Canada
    Environmental Issues in the 2011 Canadian Federal Election
    Environmental Platforms of Canada's Federal Parties in 2008
    Canadian Conservatives Repudiation of the Environment in 2008
    Canada's Conservatives at Odds with the Public on Climate Change
    Conservatives Ignore Canadians While Jeopardizing the Environment and the Economy
    Canada's Conservative Government Opposes Kyoto and Hampers Progress at COP16
    World Urges Canada to Fight Climate Change
    The State of Canada's Environment
    Canada is a World Leader in GHG Emissions
    WWF's Canadian Living Planet Report
    Green Market Opportunity Being Missed by Canada
    Why Canadian Environment Minister Resigned
    Conservatives Ignore Canadians While Jeopardizing the Environment
    Copenhagen Accord: Canada to Reduce its GHG Emissions
    The Impact of a Climate Change Deal on Canada
    Conservative Budget: No Green for Canada
    Canada Votes: Environmental Politics
    Green Policy Debated in Canadian Parliament

    Vote for Canada Vote for the Environment Vote for Change

    Under Harper's Conservatives Canada's environment is under threat. Canada's ecological problems include a wide range of issues that impact people, individual species and entire ecosystems.

    The ruling Conservative government is at odds with Canadians on climate change. Harper's Conservatives have a history of contempt for the environment. Despite the fact that the world urged Canada to do more on the environmental front, Conservatives have amassed a deplorable track record on some of the most important environmental issues, including the way they have handled international climate change summits and greenhouse gas emissions reductions.

    Due to the country's dependence on oil, Canada is a world leader in GHG emissions. Harper's Conservatives are working to ramp-up tar sands oil production which cause up to five times the climate change pollution of conventional crude oil. The proposed Canadian Enbridge Northern Gateway oil sands pipeline would cut through British Columbia’s pristine temperate rainforests and coastal ecosystems to export tar sand oil to Asia. For more information or to take action click here.

    Canada's woodland caribou are an example of one species that is in urgent danger. In Alberta, some herds have less than 100 caribou left. Caribou are considered threatened species under Canada's Species at Risk Act, yet Alberta's tar sands development and forestry industry operations are driving vulnerable herds to the brink of survival. For more information or to take action click here.

    Canada enacted the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA) in June 2003 to address the mounting threats to Canada’s endangered animals. But the Canadian government is failing to fulfill its duty of care toward our nation’s wildlife by refusing to properly implement the Act.

    Many of Canada’s endangered animals live in the Arctic, which is suffering disproportionally from the consequences of global warming. Research shows that temperatures in the Arctic are rising at almost twice the rate of the rest of the world. As a result, Arctic sea ice is shrinking by up to 5% every ten years. This is crucial because sea ice not only provides hunting ground for polar bears, but shelter and transportation for seals, walrus, arctic foxes, and the Inuit people.

    The underside of Arctic ice provides a surface for algae that support cod, char, beluga, and narwhal. The white sea ice also has a cooling effect on climate by reflecting light away from Earth's surface. As the Arctic continues to melt, global warming will advance even more quickly. For more information or to take action click here.

    There are a total of 256 species that are listed by the Scientific Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) as being extinct, extirpated, endangered, threatened or vulnerable. In Canada environmental degradation is widespread. For more detailed information about the state of Canada's environment see the WWF's Canadian Living Planet Report

    A comparison of the environmental platforms of the four national parties in Canada reveals that the Conservatives are the worst choice for the environment. In 2008 they laughed at Dion's Green Shift platform and we have had ample opportunity to see them put their environmental disregard into action.

    Contrary to the traditional view, Conservatives are not the party for the economy either. Their lack of action on the environment undermines Canada's international competitiveness and this is a high priority economic issue.

    By voting strategically, Canadians can make democracy work and perhaps even restore Canada to its rightful role as an environmental leader.

    © 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

    Related Posts
    Youth Vote May Determine the Outcome of the Canadian Election
    Strategic Voting by Canada's Youth Threatens Conservatives
    Social Media Mobilizing Youth in the Canadian Federal Election
    Leadnow: Voting for Change in Canada
    Leadnow's Declaration For Change
    Video: Leadnow Interview on CPAC
    Video: Vote Mobs Getting Youth Involved in Canada's Democracy
    Video: Leadnow's My Canada
    Environmental Issues in the 2011 Canadian Federal Election
    Environmental Platforms of Canada's Federal Parties in 2008
    Canadian Conservatives Repudiation of the Environment in 2008
    Canada's Conservatives at Odds with the Public on Climate Change
    Conservatives Ignore Canadians While Jeopardizing the Environment and the Economy
    Canada's Conservative Government Opposes Kyoto and Hampers Progress at COP16
    World Urges Canada to Fight Climate Change
    The State of Canada's Environment
    Canada is a World Leader in GHG Emissions
    WWF's Canadian Living Planet Report
    Green Market Opportunity Being Missed by Canada
    Why Canadian Environment Minister Resigned
    Conservatives Ignore Canadians While Jeopardizing the Environment
    Copenhagen Accord: Canada to Reduce its GHG Emissions
    The Impact of a Climate Change Deal on Canada
    Conservative Budget: No Green for Canada
    Canada Votes: Environmental Politics
    Green Policy Debated in Canadian Parliament

    Sunday, May 1, 2011

    Video: Leadnow's My Canada



    This video from Leadnow.ca was created by Smart Bubble Society, it targets younger voters and encourages them to vote for the Canada they want. Leadnow is famous for its Declaration For Change which is intended to set the agenda for the new Parliament. The Declaration for Change calls for political cooperation that amongst other things, protects our environment.

    This video was written and produced after Leadnow.ca hosted a cross-country process that brought Canadians together online and in their local communities to create the Declaration for Change. The video reflects Canadian's priorities articulated by 4,000 online participants, and over 80 local events.

    © 2011, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.